🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager could survive defeat by Grimsby. He weathered a decisive European final against a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, squandering the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months of experience with the Saints, to view him as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

A Strategic Clash Regarding Formation and Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince him to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements carry more weight when issued from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like him – function at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being ready to receive.

An Supreme Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that United’s style of play “will be decided in this room”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply superior. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy in the boardroom and hire a coach who will adapt their methods accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who appointed him live to blunder another day.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss them for using excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and later bin him for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.